Should Animals be used in Medical Research?

Veterinarians should normally examine the animals and their living conditions. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers. This paper was written and submitted to our database by a student to assist your with your own studies. You are free to use it https://collegeessayhelps.com/blog/cause-and-effect-essay-format/ to write your own assignment, however you must reference it properly. Furthermore, according to the World Health Organization, cancer is largely preventable, yet most health organizations that focus on cancer spend a pittance on prevention programs, such as public education.

Furthermore, the Draize test has become practically obsolete because of the development of a synthetic cellular tissue that closely resembles human skin. Researchers can test the potential damage that a product can do to the skin by using this artificial “skin” instead of testing on animals. This synthetic material turns opaque when a product damages it, closely resembling the way that a real eye reacts to harmful substances. Computers have also been used to simulate and estimate the potential damage that a product or chemical can cause, and human tissues and cells have been used to examine the effects of harmful substances.

Animal Research for Human Benefit is Unnecessary

This clearly shows that our humans are abusing animals for our benefits which should be prohibited immediately. Several organizations have started initiatives to fight for the rights of animals by advocating for the eradication of the practice. For instance, the Environmental Protection Agency is committed to eliminate chemical testing in animals by the year 2035 (Meijboom and Stassen, p. 75). Human Society International has conducted studies to compare the costs of animal testing and in vitro testing. The results have revealed that animal testing is more expensive because of “the costs incurred to breed, feed, and treat the animals” (Meijboom and Stassen, p. 75).

Finally, the testing of products on animals is completely unnecessary because viable alternatives are available. Many cosmetic companies, for example, have sought better ways to test their products without the use of animal subjects.

Studying History Essay: IELTS Task 2

Scientists have also come up with artificial skin that can be made in a lab . The results produced from these would definitely be more helpful since it would be human tested, rather than animal tested with no guarantee on how humans will react should animals be used for research argumentative essay to it. In general, the debates over the use of animals in testing for medical research testing have been historically known for centuries. After the animal testing essay introduction, it is typical to present the claims of the proponents.

These examples show that animal models can produce misleading results and lead to health complications and even death in severe cases. On the other hand, others feel that there are good arguments against this.

Should animals be used for research?

Other research methods such as in vitrotesting offer opportunities to reduce or replace animal testing. Manufacturers of products such as hand sanitizer and insect repellent, which can protect people from Zika, malaria, and West Nile Virus, test on animals to meet legal requirements for putting these products on the market. The vast majority of biologists and several of the largest biomedical and health organizations in the United States endorse animal testing. The World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki states that human trials should be preceded by tests on animals. Studying cell cultures in a petri dish, while sometimes useful, does not provide the opportunity to study interrelated processes occurring in the central nervous system, endocrine system, and immune system. It addresses the two sides of the argument by exploring reasons why animals should and should not be used in medical research. The use of paragraphing is efficient and helps with logical sequencing of ideas.

Experimenting on animals became widely used in the 1930s, when sulfanilamide was released, using diethylene glycol, not aware that it was poisonous. There was no prior testing on the medicine to provide any evidence that it was good for humans. It is should animals be used for research argumentative essay argued that if the medicine had been tested on before being released, it would have been realized that it was poisonous. After this medicine was pulled from the public, it became law that medicines would have to have research prior to being released .

Argumentative Essay Against Animal Experimenting

Researchers have to test extensively to prevent “vaccine enhancement,” a situation in which a vaccine actually makes the disease worse in some people. Scientists racing to develop a vaccine for coronavirus during the 2020 global pandemic need to test on genetically modified mice to ensure that the vaccine doesn’t make the virus worse. Pay the writer only for a finished, plagiarism-free essay that meets all your requirements. This essay is available online and might have been used by another student.